In a year, Rs 26,728 crore is paid in bribes across the service sectors in India. The health sector was the most corrupt among the 10 studied sectors, the others being education, police, land administration, judiciary, power, taxation, railways, telecommunications and public distribution.
Doctors were the main culprits, demanding 77% of the bribes, to admit patients and administer proper care. Every 12th Indian was cited as paying about Rs 621 per year while dealing with the health sector.

The Tamil Nadu state Health Department had decided to reconsider the registration granted to 28 Chennai hospitals for kidney transplant following complaints of 'rampant organ sale' in these hospitals. There have been reports that some hospitals do not even qualify for the registration. Surprise checks at these hospitals to find out if they still deserve the transplant status will be carried out by the authorities.

The Rs 100 crore kidney business in Punjab came to the notice of the press a few months ago. But, as our reader Satya Pal Dang points out, it was an open secret for years. It involved doctors like surgeon P K Sareen, Dr O P Mahajan, principal of the Government Medical College and Dr Jagdish Gargi, members of the Authorisation Committee, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Advocate Rajan Puri, police and politicians (the present chief minister says the trade could not have flourished without the connivance of the previous Akali Dal-BJP regime).
What first started as a blood donation business with labourers receiving Rs 10 and a glass of milk for their 'donations' evolved to an organised kidney supply business. Workers were promised jobs for Rs 200 a day and taken to the city where they were put up in guesthouses and a dossier prepared for when a demand for their type of kidney came along. Once a recipient was found, he was forced to undergo surgery and discharged with  the warning that complaining could get them arrested for participating in an illegal trade. Indeed, when the scam first hit the headlines, donors (not the recipients) were arrested!
Dr Sareen said he was merely a surgeon and had nothing to do with the Authorisation Committee or the middlemen. Members of the Authorisation Committee plead that they had no means to verify the documents.
The Punjab unit of the Indian Medical Association urged the government to order a judicial probe into the kidney removal rackets, especially in Ludhiana, Bathinda, Amritsar and Jalandhar.
Hospitals all over India referred kidney patients to Amritsar where 1,922 unrelated transplants were performed since 2000, compared to 650 in Delhi during the same period. No one-no government monitoring agency, no hospital authority, no medical body-saw or reported anything amiss.

A recent amendment in the law governing prenatal diagnostic techniques has banned sex selection by in vitro fertilisation (IVF). The Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Regulation and Prevention of Misuse) Act, 1994, has been renamed the Pre-conception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 2003.
The new law requires that all ultrasound equipment must be registered and reports on their use be filed with the appropriate authority.

The Tamil Nadu Medical Council, the registering authority for medical practitioners in the state, declared that it would come down heavily against doctors abetting sex selective abortion. Dr M Balasubramanian, president of the TNMC, stated that the Council would listen to the complaints of doctors conducting prenatal diagnostic tests to identify foetal sex followed by sex-selective abortion. He also said that, if convinced, the Council would constitute a disciplinary committee to enquire into the complaint and issue warnings, temporarily cancel the registration or even permanently debar doctors from practice.

A one-year-old child lost her eye when the doctor mistook cataract for cancer and removed the eye. No other eye specialist, including the doctor, approached for a second opinion before her child was operated upon, agreed to help confirm the mistake. The hospital refused to hand over discharge papers leaving the mother with no evidence to prove the doctor's negligence.
Five per cent of the 5,000 consumer complaints reported from 1991 to 1998 were for medical negligence. Less than 40 judgements were delivered against the doctors in these cases because of lack of comment from a technical expert. Doctors who provide expert comments through ACASH [Association of Consumer Action in Safety and Health] to complainants, refuse to let their identities be revealed and appear for cross-examination. ACASH is no longer able to get experts to depose before the court.
Complainants could also try to approach the medical council-which has a backlog of 158 cases, some lodged as far back as 1989.

The medical councils of Karnataka, Rajasthan, Andhra Pradesh, Delhi, West Bengal, Kerala, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Bihar and Punjab demand reforms in the functioning of the Medical Council of India. They would like the exclusive right of registration of medical practitioners and greater control over medical colleges all over India.
The state councils want their state governments to amend the relevant Acts and rules to empower the state medical council to levy punitive fines and award costs to complainants, award penalty for malicious complaint, and issue injunction against publicity in mass media for cases under trial for a period not exceeding 180 days.
The councils have also demanded that if a case of medical negligence is filed with a police station, the medical practitioner should be arrested only after consulting the state medical council.
The doctors have said that the councils will ask the Press Council of India to give strict instructions. 'We don't need press trials and press convictions. The media should abide by its ethics while reporting about doctors' alleged involvement in criminal cases,' said Dr Sapatnekar, administrator of the Maharashtra Medical Council.

Aspiring doctors will soon have to learn about ethics before they graduate from medical school.  The move, initiated by the Nashik-based Maharashtra University of Health Sciences, is part of a countrywide project kicked off by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR). The WHO and ICMR have designed a training programme on ethics for medical faculty members. Once the ethics curriculum is ready, approval will be sought from the Medical Council of India and the subject introduced in medical colleges across the country. Dr Dayanand Dongaonkar, Vice Chancellor of the Health Sciences University, said the university's academic council would decide on how the ethics module should be integrated into the current curriculum.

The Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) is investigating how a team of foreign scientists obtained blood samples of a tribal population of Andhra Pradesh for a controversial genetic study without the knowledge or permission of the ICMR. Blood samples were collected from 180 people belonging to the Chenchu and Koya tribes in Andhra Pradesh, from 106 Bengalis of different castes, 58 Konkanastha Brahmins from Mumbai and 53 Gujaratis. The team consisted of scientists from the UK, US, Russia, Germany, Estonia and Kuwait.

The Surat police busted an alleged blood donation and serum extraction racket run for the past three years. Three people including a doctor have been arrested in connection with the racket run under the aegis of Fairdeal [!] Diagnostics.
D J Patel and his son Mehul bought blood from professional donors in violation of the law and derived blood products to be sold to laboratories for diagnostic and research purposes.  Some products made by Fairdeal include Anti A, Anti B, Anti AB and VDRL serum.  Dr A M Desai provided the professional donors with fitness certificates.
The racket was busted when a patient in a government hospital was found to have donated 90 times between January 2003 and May 2003.