| Indian Journal of Medical Ethics | ||||||
![]() Home Current Issue Past Issues Support About IJME Oct-Dec2003-11(4) |
CONTROVEERSY A challenge for the medical
profession Harish
Shetty Medical professionals today have been caught on the
back foot. Patients no longer have blind faith in their doctors, and there are
too many umpires watching. There is fear and mistrust on both sides.
Paradoxically, all this also spells hope and opportunity for the discerning
vaid. This hope is shared by many within the profession who wish to enter into a
dialogue with patients, who do not have a compulsive desire to battle with them.
These doctors prefer to walk alongside the sick and those in pain, rather than
be isolated by society or monitored by external institutions. The issues discussed here emerged at several workshops conducted by my colleagues and me in Mumbai. These were conducted in hospitals, on the request of hospital deans and with general practitioners and consultants in collaboration with medical associations. A democratic relationship In the workshops that we conducted for medical practitioners, we find
that many doctors find democratic communication with face-to-face contact
fulfilling. This interaction is more productive than one which depends on blind
faith and obedience from patients. The fact is that doctors can and must do away
with the notion that they are unchallengeable authorities, and the pressures
that go with such a perception. They can shed the responsibilities associated
with being all-powerful healers. Making this shift can initially provoke anxiety. It can also be a learning
experience, providing immense work satisfaction and making the doctor hungry for
more. 'I am no longer tense when patients ask me difficult questions,' said one
doctor. 'At least I know where I stand and I feel good that they are confident
enough to express their concerns. It took me some time to accept that I may not
have all the answers but it turned out for the best.' A family doctor said his
practice had actually picked up after he started asking his patients: 'Do you
have any questions that you have hesitated to ask because you fear that you may
offend me? Please do ask them.' This way, ethical practice is not an obsessive, puritanical exercise. It
becomes a meaningful, fulfilling challenge. Healing the healer Listening to a patient enables a true exchange, one that is transparent and
non-threatening. Listening as an active process is possible when the listener's
body language reflects an attitude of genuineness. The fact is that such an
attitude is mandatory not only for the patient's good health but also for
the doctor's emotional well-being. I believe that the doctor attempting to heal
the sick also gets healed. A healed professional is also more effective than one
who is traumatised by self-mutilation. Yes, doctors actually hurt themselves by wrong practices. Doctors who receive money surreptitiously and hold many hospital
attachments without paying proper attention to any of them, are harming
themselves. The mind records all these activities with their associated
energy-positive and negative. When negative energy dominates, it damages, though
the conscious self is unaware of this. It affects everyone around, including
one's loved ones. Being ethical actually ensures good health and helps one
evolve as a professional. Technician or doctor? Many doctors pride themselves on being up-to-date with modern advances.
They boast of being highly skilled in using gadgets or understanding the
mysteries of the human body. That makes them good technicians but not
necessarily good doctors. Patients can end up with many hi-tech reports. They
are submitted to these tests through smooth talk and at exorbitant costs. A
'cut' reaches the referral physician. The patient is cheated and the doctor is
unknowingly traumatised as a result of suppressing the awareness that 'I am
doing what is not required and it is actually wrong.' This accumulated emotional
harm diminishes the impact of the doctor's work. The joy and meaning in life are
lost. It is seldom understood that a doctor is one who relies on conscience as
much as on skill. At the start of a workshop for interns, one doctor candidly stated that his
only interest was to make money. As the day progressed he stated that money is a
by-product of hard work and skill. By the end of the workshop he said that he
would not earn money at the cost of his conscience. Nowhere in medical training
do doctors learn to process their feelings and find their own balance and
comfort zones to be integrated as human beings. In the journey of the medical professional, spiritual upgradation is as
important as upgradation of skills. Lifestyle issues must be tackled by mental
health holidays, dialogues with colleagues, reasonable harmony with oneself and
others, and brutal honesty during failures. This builds an emotional energy
bank-a prerequisite for ethical practice. A chaotic lifestyle creates the
perfect conditions for an abusive medical practice. Processing pain In many of our workshops we ask doctors to discuss any near-death
experiences, or the death of their loved ones. However, they have learned to
block emotion and it takes some time for them to start expressing their
feelings. A gynaecologist said he believed that he could have done better to
save the life of his father but failed. Many felt guilty and felt that they had
not done enough. One doctor burst into tears and blamed me for asking such a
question. It was felt that in the medical profession crying is a sign of
weakness. Some doctors feel uncomfortable discussing the death of their patients with
their relatives. This often reflects an inability to process pain, distress and
death as emotional processes in one's own life and understand this in the lives
of the relatives. This distorts communication and the ethical base of
functioning. Those who process pain and accept it as an inevitable part of life
function better and are able to relate to those in difficult circumstances. This
leads to harmony in situations where exchanges are not always pleasant and
comfortable between the patient and doctor. The struggle within At one of the workshops a successful family physician said that being
ethical had lost him money and even friends for his colleagues teased him for
being upright. Later, he said that at least he was content with what he had and
could hold his head up in society without shame. Still, his convictions were
coloured by intermittent doubt. Many doctors who have resisted the temptations of a 'cut' and a
market-driven economy, today feel that they were foolish and naïve in not making
extra bucks. Such professionals find themselves lonely and isolated amidst
turbulence as new values find their place in an era of liberalisation. They must
seek the company of colleagues with similar perspectives. This horizontal
bonding, and sharing, will give them a sense of belonging and reinforce their
conviction that they have acted correctly. Doubts will always exist, and they
will often get resolved just by the process of expressing them. Some indicators
that doubts are not useful are when one takes the criticism of colleagues very
seriously, starts brooding about one's own behaviour and values success in
financial terms. As patients' awareness and understanding increase, health professionals
should respond not with a defensive and protective armour but with a relaxed
approach. They should replace fear and paranoia with love and compassion. This
is because healing begins from within oneself. The road of ethical practice is
not a journey of dos and don'ts, right and wrong. It is one in which the patient
and doctor walk hand in hand. HARISH SHETTY,4A/11
Taxilla, Mahakali, Andheri (East), Mumbai 400093, India. e-mail:hshetty@vsnl.com |
|||||
|
| ||||||