Dublin Core PKP Metadata Items Metadata for this Document
 
1. Title Title of document Evaluation of research in India – are we doing it right?
 
2. Creator Author's name, affiliation, country Muthu Madhan; Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru 560012, Karnataka, India
 
3. Subject Discipline(s)
 
3. Subject Keyword(s)
 
4. Description Abstract The evaluation of performance in scientific research at any level – whether at the individual, institutional, research council or country level – is not easy. Traditionally, research evaluation at the individual and institutional levels has depended largely on peer opinion, but with the rapid growth of science over the last century and the availability of databases and scientometric techniques, quantitative indicators have gained importance. Both peer review and metrics are subject to flaws, more so in India because of the way they are used. Government agencies, funding bodies and academic and research institutions in India suffer from the impact factor and h-index syndrome. The uninformed use of indicators such as average and cumulative impact factors and the arbitrary criteria stipulated by agencies such as the University Grants Commission, Indian Council of Medical Research and the Medical Council of India for selection and promotion of faculty have made it difficult to distinguish good science from the bad and the indifferent. The exaggerated importance given by these agencies to the number of publications, irrespective of what they report, has led to an ethical crisis in scholarly communication and the reward system in science. These agencies seem to be unconcerned about the proliferation of predatory journals and conferences. After giving examples of the bizarre use of indicators and arbitrary recruitment and evaluation practices in India, we summarise the merits of peer review and quantitative indicators and the evaluation practices followed elsewhere.
 
5. Publisher Organizing agency, location Forum for Medical Ethics Society
 
6. Contributor Sponsor(s)
 
7. Date (YYYY-MM-DD) 2018-03-23
 
8. Type Status & genre
 
8. Type Type
 
9. Format File format HTML , PDF
 
10. Identifier Uniform Resource Identifier https://www.issuesinmedicalethics.org/articles/evaluation-of-research-in-india-are-we-doing-it-right/
 
11. Source Title; vol., no. (year) Indian Journal of Medical Ethics;: Making research ethical: Challenges old and new
 
12. Language English=en en
 
13. Relation Supp. Files
 
14. Coverage Geo-spatial location, chronological period, research sample (gender, age, etc.)
 
15. Rights Copyright and permissions

All articles published in IJME are available on its website free of charge. The copyright for published material belongs to IJME/FMES. IJME freely permits the reprint (or reproduction on a website) of articles from the journal, as long as this is for non-commercial use and appropriate credit is given to the author and the journal and publication details are mentioned. The commercial use of our content can be made only after obtaining permission from and on payment to IJME. This is intended to support production of the journal.